Category Archives: Governor

Toensing’s arrival ushers in new chapter to Shumlin/Dodge land dispute

A high-profile attorney with ties to the Republican Party has become the newest character in an ongoing saga featuring the governor of Vermont and his ill-fated land deal.

Brady Toensing, whose former clients include Republican candidate for governor Brian Dubie, has signed on to represent Jeremy Dodge, the jilted East Montpelier landowner seeking to regain the 16-acre homestead he sold to Peter Shumlin last fall.

Dodge’s children say Shumlin exploited their troubled father by using the threat of an imminent tax sale to snap up for $58,000 a property valued by town listers at $140,000.

But what has until now been a neighborly dispute could soon turn political as Toensing, a veteran Republican operative, enters the fray.

Toensing on Tuesday denied any partisan motivations. In his lone statement to the press, he said he welcomes “the opportunity to assist a fellow Vermonter.”

“Mr. Dodge has been dealing with a sophisticated and shrewd businessman, a businessman who is also the most powerful person in Vermont, represented by one of the best lawyers money can buy,” Toensing said. “Mr. Dodge clearly needed some help.”

Toensing has represented Dubie on at least two occasions, most recently in 2011, when the state alleged that Dubie ran afoul of campaign-finance laws in his 2010 bid for governor by sharing polling data with the Republican Governors Association.

Toensing brokered a settlement in which Dubie paid a $10,000 civil penalty and made a $10,000 contribution to the Vermont Food Bank, though he never had to admit wrongdoing.

Toensing is a resident of Charlotte. But he is a partner at the storied diGenova & Toensing, LLP, a Washington, D.C., law firm founded by his step-father and mother. In a 1998 Washington Post article, reporter Howard Kurtz described Joe diGenova and Victoria Toensing as a “classic Washington power couple,” taking to media airwaves to foment political scandal on behalf of Republican interests.

Prior to joining the family firm, Brady Toensing worked as a legislative assistant in the early 1990s for Warren B. Rudman, the two-term U.S. Senator from New Hampshire.

Shumlin has retained his own politically connected lawyer in the form of Jerry Diamond, the former three-term attorney general who was the Democratic nominee for governor in 1980 – a race he lost to Republican Richard Snelling.

For more on this story, check out tomorrow’s editions of The Times Argus and Rutland Herald.

“Routine tip” spawned FBI interest in Shumlin land deal

A few weeks into the 2013 legislative session, Special Agent Christopher Destito began making the rounds at the Statehouse.

According to three people with whom he spoke, Destito said he planned to reinvigorate what had been a sleepy public-corruption division at the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Vermont headquarters in Burlington.

He had informal meetings with several lawmakers, handed out his card, and encouraged anyone with information about shady dealings by government officials to get in touch.

It’s the same Christopher Destito that has allegedly been asking around about Gov. Peter Shumlin’s controversial land deal with Jeremy Dodge last fall. But while reports of FBI involvement have appeared in multiple media outlets over the past week, evidence of any criminal wrongdoing is nonexistent. And save for a non-committal statement from U.S. District Attorney Tristram Coffin, federal authorities have been tight-lipped about what it is they’re after.

Asked last Wednesday whether the FBI was interviewing people in an effort to gain information about a land deal in which Shumlin purchased for $58,000 a 16-acre homestead valued by town listers at $140,000, Coffin offered a terse statement.

“The FBI followed up on a routine lead,” Coffin told the Vermont Press Bureau. “And there’s no active investigation in our office.”

Asked whether that routine lead related to Shumlin’s land deal, Coffin said he wouldn’t comment further.

Three people earlier this month relayed off-the-record accounts to the Press Bureau of being interviewed by Destito about Shumlin. But it wasn’t until Bernie Corliss spoke with the Bureau last Tuesday that someone came forward with an on-the-record story of an FBI interview.

Corliss, a longtime friend of Dodge’s, said Destito had knocked on the front door of his residence at the Weston Mobile Home Park in Berlin last Monday evening.

“He just wanted to know what I knew about the deal, and what I knew about Jeremy,” Corliss told the Press Bureau last Tuesday, a day before news of the land deal broke. “I gave him all the information I had, and he left his card.”

A business card on a table in Corliss’ living room contained Destito’s name and contact number. The Vermont Press Bureau made phone contact with Destito Tuesday evening. Asked whether he was interviewing people about the Shumlin/Dodge land deal, Destito said “I’m sorry, I can’t speak to the press.”

“If I do, I’ll get in a lot of trouble,” Destito said.

Asked if he would speak off-the-record about the matter, he declined.

“I’m sorry, I don’t cut corners,” Destito said.

The FBI traditionally takes the lead on state-level public-corruption investigations and is, according to its government website, “singularly situated to combat this corruption, with the skills and capabilities to run complex undercover operations and surveillance.”

According to Coffin, there is no “investigation.” And Shumlin said Friday that the only thing he knows about the FBI link is what he’s read in the press.

“We have not been contacted by anyone from law enforcement anywhere along the process,” Shumlin said.

A series of one-on-one interviews with media outlets Friday suggests that Shumlin and his legal advisors are supremely confident there’s nothing to the FBI angle. A criminal defense attorney who spoke on background last week said the governor would under no circumstances submit to open-ended questioning from reporters if he believed a formal deposition was in the offing.

Governor grants Jeremy Dodge reprieve on July 15 deadline for vacating East Montpelier home

Peter Shumlin

Peter Shumlin

In a written statement issued moments ago, Peter Shumlin said he’ll waive the July 15 deadline by which Jeremy Dodge is contractual obligated to move out of the Foster Road homestead the governor purchased from him last November.

“As I have said, I was saddened and disappointed that Jerry Dodge now regrets our agreement. I see and talk with Jerry frequently, and yet first heard about this from the press,” Shumlin said. ”When Jerry asked for my help to avoid the tax sale, I agreed, and I want to see this through to a good resolution. If that means Jerry stays in the house beyond July 15, that’s fine with me.”

Shumlin encountered criticism in recent days after media outlets reported details of a real estate transaction in which the second-term Democrat acquired the property for $58,000. The land is valued by town listers at $140,000.

More on this story later.

UPDATE: Jeremy Dodge’s income is below the federal poverty level. So why was his tax bill last year almost $5k?

Stefan Hard / Times Argus Jeremy Dodge's home, left, is seen just on the other side of a treeline from Gov. Peter Shumlin's new home at right in this aerial photo taken Tuesday over East Montpelier.  Shumlin purchased a 32-acre parcel  in June on which to build his new home, then purchased Dodge's 16-acre homestead in October in a private transaction that avoided an auction of Dodge's property for unpaid taxes. Dodge new says he regrets the sale.

Stefan Hard / Times Argus
Jeremy Dodge’s home, left, is seen just on the other side of a treeline from Gov. Peter Shumlin’s new home at right in this aerial photo taken Tuesday over East Montpelier. Shumlin purchased a 32-acre parcel in June on which to build his new home, then purchased Dodge’s 16-acre homestead in October in a private transaction that avoided an auction of Dodge’s property for unpaid taxes. Dodge new says he regrets the sale.

 

 It was Jeremy Dodge’s inability to pay nearly $18,000 in back taxes that ultimately cost him the deed to his 16-acre homestead in East Montpelier. But how could man who failed to crack the five-figure threshold in annual income accumulate such as massive property-tax bill?

Vermont’s progressive tax code reduces the obligations of lower-income homeowners by limiting their burden to a percentage of their annual income. Residents’ ability to avail themselves of “income sensitivity,” however, requires them file a “homestead declaration” with the Vermont Department of Taxes, something Dodge apparently failed to do.

Between 2010 and 2012, according to state records, no one filed a homestead declaration on the Dodge property. Dodge, who says he never made more than $10,000 in each of those years, was charged full freight on property taxes as a result. His bill for tax year 2012 – the property was at that point appraised at $233,700 – came in at $4,597.11.

Income sensitivity would have cut the bill to a fraction of that amount – the law limits property-tax bills of low-income homeowners’ to about 5 percent of annual income. According to East Montpelier town records, Dodge assumed ownership of the property deed in 2009, after which the delinquent taxes began piling up. Continue reading

Latest Shumlin land deal leaves seller feeling jilted

As his July 15 moving date nears, Jeremy Dodge’s seller’s remorse has begun to intensify.

Back on Nov. 7, when Dodge finalized the sale of his 16-acre homestead in bucolic East Montpelier, he believed the deal he cut with its buyer, Peter Shumlin, was the only way to avoid imminent ouster from the residence his now-deceased parents built 31 years ago.

He’d accumulated more than $17,000 in back taxes since inheriting the property in 2009, and the looming tax sale, Dodge says he believed at the time, would result in his eviction from the property.

So without a lawyer to represent him, Dodge signed a purchase-and-sale agreement in which Shumlin, the second-term Democratic governor of Vermont, acquired the property for $58,000 — less than a quarter of the $233,700 for which the homestead was then appraised.

“I could not afford a lawyer,” Dodge said. “And (Shumlin) said we’d just use his lawyers.”

The sale price included $9,000 representing the value of the rent Shumlin said he was saving Dodge by allowing him to remain in the home from November through July, and a $9,000 “seller repair credit” — money Dodge won’t get if he hasn’t upgraded the condition of the property by the middle of next month.

“I don’t have nothing bad to say about him, but yeah, I got ripped off, plain and simple,” Dodge said Tuesday. “I wish it had turned out differently. I wish that I had let it go to tax auction.”

An East Montpelier town lister has since lowered the appraised value to $140,000, owing to the decrepit condition of the house in which Dodge has lived since before his parents died.

In an emailed statement late Tuesday, Shumlin said the sale price was fair.

“I believe $58,000 was a fair price, and we both agreed to it,” Shumlin said. “The house is in terrible shape; it will have to be knocked down or totally gutted.”

As for Dodge’s lack of counsel, Shumlin said he urged him last year to remedy that.

“He didn’t have a lawyer on this sale,” Shumlin said. “But I did recommend it.”

But the 53-year-old Dodge, a parolee with a criminal rap sheet that includes convictions for drugs and domestic assault, says that if he knew last year what he knows now, he would have been able to avoid losing the house, or at least sold it more profitably.

Check out the full story, plus pictures of Dodge and his property and links to relevant documents,  at: http://www.timesargus.com/article/20130522/NEWS03/705229893

House, Senate poised to withdraw controversial tax plan, pave way for copacetic adjournment

Speaker of the House Shap Smith

Shap Smith

House and Senate Democrats look poised to end their veto showdown with Gov. Peter Shumlin by withdrawing an income-tax overhaul that would have delivered tax cuts to more than 200,000  middle-class Vermonters.

Neither House Speaker Shap Smith nor Senate President John Campbell have made any definitive announcements today about the status of their battle with Shumlin over the tax reform proposal. But in an interview on WDEV’s the Mark Johnson show this morning, Smith seemed to indicate that he didn’t want to escalate the standoff.

“It’s going to be a good proposal if it’s passed this year, or if it’s passed (next year),” Smith said.

Since the impacts of the reform proposal wouldn’t begin taking effect until fiscal year 2015 anyway, Smith said, “our feeling is we can still do it (next) January if we decide not to go forward with it today.”

The tone telegraphed the withdrawal of the proposal – an official announcement will be coming later this afternoon – a concession that would signal the end of a late-session battle that has pitted the Democratic governor against a House and Senate controlled by members of his own party.

Smith and Campbell had sought to cap itemized deductions, and used the resulting revenue to bring down marginal income-tax rates across the board. The changes would have had the effect of increasing taxes on about 15,000 wealthier tax filers, and decreased obligations modestly for about 240,000 people, mostly in low- and middle-class tax brackets.

Janet Ancel

Janet Ancel

Rep. Janet Ancel, chairwoman of the House Committee on Ways and Means, championed the plan as a revenue-neutral way of delivering tax relief to working Vermonters. Shumlin, however, said the proposal violated the no-new-taxes pledge he entered into with lawmakers last week, and made it clear he would veto the bill if it made it to his desk.

Shumlin also criticized the plan for coming so late in the session, and said it hadn’t been sufficiently vetted.

Smith this morning said that if there’s going to be a fight over the proposal, he wants it to be over the merits of the policy, not over whether it came too late in the session, or whether it reneges on any deals.

“We don’t think something that’s pretty good policy should be clouded by technical arguments, and we don’t want to fight about anything other than, is this a good idea?” Smith said.

In the months between now and the second half of the biennium, Smith said, he believes he can help Shumlin learn to appreciate the rightness of the House and Senate’s thinking.

“We think this is a fair tax policy that’s going to lower taxes for over 200,000 Vermonters, and we think we can take the time and convince the governor that this makes sense to do,” Smith said. “We think this is something the governor and the Legislature should be out championing, not fighting about.”

The dispute over tax policy may the most contentious issue standing between lawmakers and a Tuesday adjournment, but it isn’t the only area of disagreement in the building.

An effort to insert into the budget language previously stricken from a bill dealing with mountaintop wind development has tripped up negotiations around the $5.3 billion bill. House lawmakers are trying to desperately to salvage pieces of an education-funding reform bill that has stalled in the Senate. And the House floor this evening – and perhaps well into the night – will have one last debate over an end-of-life-choices bill that appears all but certain to win final passage.

Single moms can’t afford Shumlin cuts, says Vermont Commission on Women

In a somewhat unusual public foray into legislative politics, the Vermont Commission on Women this afternoon issued a statement opposing Gov. Peter Shumlin’s plan for welfare reform.

The 16-member commission, which bills itself as a “non-partisan state agency dedicated to legislative, economic, social, and political fairness,” said it weighed the matter carefully before determining the plan would have a disproportionate impact on single mothers.

Shumlin has proposed a five-year cap on welfare benefits, a cost-cutting measure he says will encourage impoverished Vermonters to get jobs. The move would shave about $6 million annually in human services costs, and kick about 1,200 families off the welfare rolls beginning in October.

In a release, the Vermont Commission on Women said the “overwhelming majority of Vermont households receiving this cash assistance are women, and limits to this program will disproportionately affect female-headed families with children.”

A number of facts lead the VCW to this conclusion,” the release said. “The lives of these families are complex. They often include challenges, such as lack of transportation, education and child care; mental health concerns; care of a child with a disability; or trauma from having survived domestic violence.”

In a written statement, the commission’s executive director, Cary Brown, said Shumlin’s proposal targets those that can least afford it.

These are Vermont’s most fragile and vulnerable families,” Brown said. “The Commission believes that budgetary concerns should not be balanced on the backs of those least likely to be able to function without government assistance.”

Shumlin tells Politico: “Congress… is holding America hostage”

Peter Shumlin

Peter Shumlin

From Politico.com reporter Kevin Robillard:

Vermont Gov. Peter Shumlin has seen the enemy — and it is Republicans in Congress.

“The one thing that stands in our way of prosperity, of job creation, right now, is this Congress, which refuses to work with the president,” Shumlin said Friday on POLITICO’s State Solutions Conference, adding: “We have a Congress that is holding American prosperity hostage right now; we have Republican governors who are passing the tax policies they can’t get past a Democratic [Senate] and a Democratic president.”

He was speaking at Politico’s “State Solutions” conference, and had much more to say, on gun control and on the 2016 Presidential race. The interviewer gets in a nice sigh, about 45 seconds into the video – watch the video and read the full story at Politico.com.

Governor reimburses state for campaign trip in state plane

Jeb Wallace-Brodeur / Staff File Photo State aviation program administrator Guy Rouelle stands next to the state-owned Cessna.

Jeb Wallace-Brodeur / Staff File Photo
State aviation program administrator Guy Rouelle stands next to the state-owned Cessna.

By Pete Hirschfeld

MONTPELIER — Until recently, most Vermonters probably weren’t aware that the state had its own plane. But news that Gov. Peter Shumlin used the single-engine Cessna in the run-up to last year’s election has lent the aircraft some newfound celebrity.
On Sept. 27 of last year, Shumlin hopped aboard the state-owned plane to make a late-evening flight from Lyndonville to Middlebury. It was one of Shumlin’s five flights aboard the 51-year-old Cessna last year, but it’s proving to be the most controversial.
That’s because Shumlin was en route to Middlebury State Airport so he could catch a car ride to a campaign fundraiser at a private home in Lincoln. When the Burlington weekly Seven Days broke news of the trip last weekend, administration officials asked the campaign to retroactively reimburse taxpayers for the flight. Continue reading

Nine-person committee to recommend tax for single-payer – in 2015

The Shumlin administration and top legislative leaders will delegate to a nine-person panel the task of coming up with a way to finance single-payer health care.

The issue of financing has followed the Democratic governor since he made single-payer the cornerstone of his gubernatorial agenda in 2010. The single-payer law enacted five months after his election directed his administration to deliver a financing plan by last month. Shumlin, however, said it was still premature to tell Vermonters what tax he’d use to pay for the universal system.

The decision to form the new panel defers until 2015 the unveiling of an official financing recommendation.

The panel will includes two appointees each from Shumlin, House Speaker Shap Smith and Senate President John Campbell. The three men will then decide together who should fill the three remaining seats.

“They will really dig into the issue of what the cost of the system will be and how the system is currently financed, and what a system going forward would like if you financed it a different way,” Smith said today. “I would see them putting forward a financing plan that supported a single-payer plan, or as close to single-payer as we could get under law.”

For more on this story, check out tomorrow’s editions of The Times Argus and Rutland Herald.

Administration makes scathing case against its own proposal

The most damning argument yet against the Shumlin administration’s plan to cap welfare benefits has come from, well, the Shumlin administration.

In his budget address last month, Gov. Peter Shumlin said “Reach Up” benefits, as they’re called, should be “temporary,” not “timeless.” He said the state should cap lifetime benefits at five years, a move that would save the state an estimated $6 million in fiscal year 2014.

But as is being reported today by VTDigger’s Alicia Freese and Seven Days’ Paul Heintz, the administration took a hard look at an identical proposal in 2012, and pretty much condemned it.

As Freese noted, a January report signed off on by Commissioner of Children and Families Dave Yacavone – the same guy urging lawmakers to adopt the plan now – concluded that capping benefits at 60 months “could leave families destitute and at risk and will create a large hole in the fabric of Vermont’s safety net for those most in need.”

In a passage pulled by Heintz, the report says that “the families who would be affected by this cut have three times as many barriers to gaining self-sufficiency as the general Reach Up caseload population.”

“They are families with limited abilities and resources to recover from such a loss. The elimination of their financial assistance may put their children at risk and force a cost shift to other programs.”

For the full stories, head over to http://vtdigger.org/2013/02/06/shumlin-proposal-on-welfare-work-requirements-rebutted-by-2012-report/ and http://7d.blogs.com/offmessage/2013/02/reach-up-beneficiaries-push-back-on-shumlins-proposed-cuts.html

 

Progs slam Shumlin over plan to fund childcare by cutting benefits to poor

A group of Progressive lawmakers this afternoon took an aggressive stance against Peter Shumlin’s first high-profile proposal of 2013, saying his “half-baked” plan to fund new childcare subsidies would “pit working families against one another.”

Shumlin won plaudits last week for proposing that Vermont spend an additional $17 million on childcare subsidies for low-income parents. But his plan to fund it – reducing an “earned income tax credit” that now delivers refund checks to more than 40,000 low-income tax filers – has drawn a scathing rebuke.

At a press conference in the Cedar Creek room, Rep. Chris Pearson, a Burlington Progressive, said it can’t be considered a “serious proposal.”

I have yet to hear from any Democrat who supports this idea. Republicans have articulated their concerns, and Progressives are solidly opposed to this funding scheme,” Pearson said.

Pearson said Vermont needs to move ahead with the additional childcare subsidies, but that “there is no reason to cut the most effective anti-poverty program in Vermont” to do it.

Pearson and Sen. Anthony Pollina said a small increase on the tax rates of wealthy Vermonters would easily cover the cost.

It’s odd, Pearson said, that Shumlin last year rejected their proposed tax hike on people making more than $373,000 per year as a “broad-based tax increase.”

He said he was opposed to broad-based tax increases, even though our proposal lat year only impacted about 4,000 families,” Pearson said. “By contrast, this proposal hits over 40,000.”

After the press conference, Secretary of Human Services Doug Racine again defended the plan. Vermont has limited resources with which to help lower-income residents, Racine says, And he and the governor believe the $17 million will deliver more value to Vermont families if it’s reallocated in the form of a childcare subsidy.

Racine also says that Vermont’s tax code has become more progressive in the 25 years since the EITC was created, something that has benefited financially the people who would be affected by the proposed reduction.

Pearson said he thinks the whole episode may just be an elaborate political play.

Gov. Shumlin is a skilled politician, and I fear this is a diversionary tactic,” Pearson said. “Perhaps he hopes his laughable revenue plan will be enough to distract lawmakers and advocates from the budget cuts we expect next week,” Pearson said. “We will not be distracted. We will work tirelessly to protect those who the economic boom of previous decades has left behind.”

Anti-single-payer group steals page from Michael Moore

You might remember ‘Sicko,’ the 2007 documentary from Michael Moore that made the case for single-payer by contrasting the for-profit health care industry in the U.S. with government-run systems in places like Canada, Cuba and the UK.

Now, this state’s leading anti-single-payer group is stealing a page from the liberal provocateur as it tries to send precisely the opposite message. 

Vermonters for Health Care Freedom wants to raise $18,250 to fund production of “Lessons from Canada,” a documentary it says will show what a train wreck single-payer is north of the border.

In an email to would-be benefactors, Jeff Wennberg, executive director of VHCF, says the documentary “will help us activate an already existing coalition of conservatives, independents, and moderate Democrats who think Vermont’s single payer plan is reckless.”

 

Wennberg already has a trailer up  – you can check it out at https://transaxt.com/Donate/4EP84S/VHCFSSinglePayerDocumentary/

 

The teaser gives a little taste of what the full documentary would have in store.

 

This whole idea that it’s free, well it’s  like if you have a free bar at a wedding, some people won’t be as careful as they should, and as a result the liquor may run out,” says one guy in a suit.

 

Look for the health care debate to ramp up next Thursday, when the Shumlin administration unveils it’s long-awaited single-payer financing plan. They’d been scheduled to present the plan today – statute actually required them to – but are holding off until the governor drops his fiscal year 2014 budget.

 

 

Shumlin’s stance on federal assault weapon ban: “What I think doesn’t matter.”

Vermont’s usually opinionated governor has gone uncharacteristically silent on at least one hot-button controversy: a federal ban on assault weapons.

A school shooting last month that claimed the lives of 20 kindergarten students in Newtown, Conn., has sparked a national conversation about the adequacy of the nation’s gun laws. Asked repeatedly since the incident whether he thinks Congress should impose a ban on assault rifles, or the high-capacity magazines that maximize their firepower, Shumlin has deflected.

“What I think doesn’t matter,” Shumlin said of his non-stance during a press conference Thursday.

On the issue of state-based gun laws, Shumlin has been far clearer, saying he opposes any attempts in Montpelier to restrict Vermonters’ access to guns. While Shumlin on Thursday said he “welcomes the debate,” he said he thinks state-specific laws designed to avert tragedies like the one in Newtown are misguided.

“Because you can go buy it in New Hampshire or another state or on the internet,” Shumlin said. “My point is we need a 50-state solution. We’re not an island.”

Shumlin said that in areas like renewable energy, health care and gay rights, it has made sense for Vermont to assume a leadership position nationally.

“What I feel very strongly is it’s up to me to lead when the federal government isn’t,” Shumlin said. “The federal government is not leading on single-payer health care – they won’t even say the word. They are not leading on renewables – most of them (in the Republican-controlled U.S. House) don’t believe in climate change.”

On the issue of gun control, however, Shumlin said Thursday that President Barack Obama has demonstrated a commitment to act.

“The last I saw the president of the United States held a press conference and asked Vice President (Joe) Biden to lead a group to come up with a national policy to deal with the crisis we have before us,” Shumlin said. “So I have confidence in them to do their job.”

Asked whether he believes the federal solution should include “some restrictions” on guns, Shumlin said “let’s see what they come up with.”

Eric Davis, professor emeritus of political science at Middlebury College, said Shumlin’s reluctance to enter the gun-control fray might stem from a desire not to distract from his core legislative agenda.

He said it also doesn’t fit well into his broader political strategy.

“He wants to govern as a fiscal conservative … and continue to appeal to voters on the left on issues like marijuana decriminalization, death with dignity, health care reform,” Davis said. “And I think he just sees the gun issue as not fitting in with his overall political strategy.”

Heralded as a defender of the Second Amendment by the National Rifle Association, Shumlin earlier this fall won the endorsement of the gun lobby’s political arm, which also contributed to his reelection campaign.

In its Oct. 5 endorsement announcement, the NRA cited Shumlin’s past opposition to “storage requirements of firearms and … punitive taxes on lead ammunition.” The organization also lauded him for supporting “the creation and development of publicly accessible shooting ranges.”

“Peter Shumlin has demonstrated his support for the Second Amendment,” said Chris W. Cox, chief lobbyist for the NRA. “We urge all NRA members, gun owners, and sportsmen in Vermont to vote Peter Shumlin for Governor on November 6.”

Vilaseca to head newly minted Agency of Education

Last year, Gov. Peter Shumlin won legislation to endow his office will increased power over public education. On Thursday, he announced the appointment of the man he says will help him exert it.

Armando Vilaseca has been named to serve as Vermont’s first-ever secretary of education, a cabinet-level post whose allegiance to the governor will lend the executive branch unprecedented influence over education policy in the state.

Until now, the commissioner of education has answered to the nine-member State Board of Education, a century-old arrangement conceived to help insulate public education from the ideological bent of politicians.

Shumlin though convinced lawmakers last year that the system had prevented the state’s top elected officeholder from enacting needed reforms in one of government’s central roles.

Vilaseca has served as commissioner of education for the last four years and was among the three candidates nominated for the secretary’s post by the State Board of Education.

Shumlin said otday that in Vilaseca, he’s found a steady hand to lead the transition.

“I was lucky to have three strong candidates for the secretary’s post, but with my expansive education agenda, making a change in leadership right now does not make sense and I have confidence Armando is the right person to be sure we don’t miss a beat in the coming months,” Shumlin said.

Asked during a press conference what exactly his “expansive” agenda contains, Shumlin said he wanted to save details for a big reveal in his State of the State address next week.

Vilaseca headlined a slew of executive-branch job announcements Thursday, including the appointment of former House Majority Leader Lucy Leriche to serve as deputy secretary of commerce and community development.

Leriche is currently working under contract for Green Mountain Power.

Shumlin said more changes are in store for an Agency of Commerce to which he has decided to enact structural changes.

Under former Gov. James Douglas, the Department of Economic Development was folded into commerce. Shumlin said economic development demands fulltime focus, and that he is reestablishing the department so that he can appoint a dedicated commissioner.

The search for that position is underway.

Among the other executive staff changes:

  • Irene Recovery Officer Sue Minter will return to her role as deputy secretary of transportation; her deputy, Dave Rapaport, will become the new Irene Czar
  • Susan Allen, who in her first-term role as “special assistant to the governor” served as spokeswoman and communications chief, will take on the deputy chief of staff post being vacated by outgoing Alex MacLean. Allen, formerly managing editor of the Times Argus, will continue to handle public and press relations
  • Former Lamoille County Sen. Susan Bartlett, who spent the first term as a special assistant to the governor, will take a new job in the Agency of Human resources, where she will coordinate a range of projects for the administration
  • A former representative from Johnson, Floyd Nease – he served as House Majority Leader prior to Leriche – will serve as director of systems integration at the Agency of Human Services. Shumlin said Nease has been asked to streamline the delivery of services to vulnerable families