Tag Archives: Democrats

Walz tapped for House seat

MONTPELIER – Tommy Walz, a former educator from Barre City, has been tapped by Gov. Peter Shumlin to replace former Rep. Tess Taylor.

Walz was picked from a list of three candidates submitted to Gov. Shumlin by the Barre City Democratic Committee.

“I am pleased to appoint Tommy Walz to fill this opening,” Shumlin said in a statement. “His long-term commitment and service to the Barre community will make him an excellent voice for his constituents in the Vermont House of Representatives.”

Walz first moved to Barre in 1967 to teach English and German at Spaulding High School. He and his wife Leslie moved several times, including a stint living and working in Germany. Walz came returned to Vermont in 1979 where he again taught English at Spaulding High School before working in computer sales and data consulting.

“I am proud to be joining the Barre contingent in the Vermont House of Representatives,” Walz said in a statement. “Barre has given us much and Leslie and I have had the chance to return some small measure through volunteering and serving on local school boards. Representing the people of Barre City in the Vermont House provides yet one more way for me to serve my community.”

Walz currently serves on the Barre Supervisory Union Board and the Spaulding High School Board.

Taylor resigned from her seat in the House last month to serve as the executive director of Vermont’s Coalition for Universal Reform. The newly formed group is planning a push for Shumlin’s universal, publicly-financed health care plan.

Shumlin’s office said Walz will be sworn in “promptly.”

Democratic PAC settles with state

MONTPELIER — A Democratic PAC must may a $30,000 penalty for violating the state’s campaign finance law during the 2010 election.

Green Mountain Future, a political action committee created by the Democratic Governors Association has settled with the state for the $30,000 penalty, Vermont Attorney General William Sorrell announced Wednesday.

The settlement, which has been approved by the Vermont Superior Court, requires GMF to pay the state a civil penalty of $20,000 for failing to include its address on its website or in television ads that ran during the 2010 gubernatorial campaign. GMF must also pay a $10,000 penalty the court had previously imposed for not registering as a PAC and filing campaign finance reports.

“Voters are legally entitled to know who is seeking to influence them,” Sorrell said a statement. “PACs need to obey the laws. They cannot hide. They must disclose their identity, including their address, their donors, and their expenditures, to the extent required by law.”

GMF spent more than $500,000 during the 2010 campaign on political ads. Television ads attacking Republican candidate Brian Dubie, the state’s former lieutenant governor, aired thousands of times but did not include complete identifying information. The public had no way of knowing who was behind the ads because GMF did not file required reports, Sorrell said.

The Vermont Superior Court determined that GMF violated Vermont’s campaign finance laws in Dec. 2011 but did not impose a financial penalty for its failure to fully identify itself in ads.

The Vermont Supreme Court then ruled in September that the lower court erred in not imposing a penalty. In its decision the Vermont Supreme Court said “the difficulty of calculating a penalty [does not] mean that no penalty can be awarded.”

The case returned to the trial court for consideration of an appropriate penalty. The settlement announced Wednesday closes out the only remaining issue in the enforcement action, Sorrell said.

Health care debate rages on as Rs, Ds argue merits of exchange

As predicted, the debate over H.559 – legislation that will, beginning in 2014, establish Vermont’s health benefits exchange – turned on party lines Thursday as House Republicans used a floor debate to hammer home their misgivings about the bill.

The GOP is concerned chiefly about the involuntary mandates contained of the legislation. Federal law requires each state to have a health benefits exchange, but doesn’t require anyone to actually purchase their insurance from it. The Shumlin administration and House Democrats, by contrast, are forcing all individuals and all businesses with 50 or fewer employees – about 96,000 Vermonters total – to buy from the exchange. Continue reading

Dems say Lisman ads violate elections laws

He swore late last year that his newly launched “Campaign for Vermont Prosperity” wouldn’t be political. But has Bruce Lisman already run afoul of Vermont’s campaign finance laws?

According to the Vermont Democratic Party, which filed a complaint today with Attorney General Bill Sorrell, Lisman’s organization has violated state law by engaging in overt electioneering without registering as a political action committee. Continue reading

Vt. Dems in attack mode after McDonald comments

MONTPELIER – The Vermont Democratic Party has both barrels blazing as it responds to recent comments from state Republican Party Chairwoman Pat McDonald, and its doing all it can to link the state GOP to the Republicans in Washington, D.C

McDonald issued a news release last week that criticized Gov. Peter Shumlin's handling of the economy before Tropical Storm Irene caused major flooding in the state on Aug. 28. She also outlined a five-point plan to “get Vermont back on track quickly” after the flood, a plan that called for education finance reforms and a rejection of new taxes to pay for the recovery, among other things.

She also called for a freeze on non-essential, non-Irene spending.

Later, she told Vermont Public Radio there were “legitimate discussions to be had” about how the country funds disaster aid – a reference to the fight over budget offsets U.S. House Republicans were seeking to pay for disaster spending.

The Vermont Dems have pounced, issuing a news release Tuesday and another one Wednesday taking McDonald to task.

They're using McDonald's apparent endorsement of budget offsets for disaster aid to try to make as close a link as they can between the state GOP and the U.S. House Republicans, who have been less-than-forthcoming with disaster cash.

The Vermont Republican Party has embraced the extremist partisan agenda of the Tea Party movement in response to Tropical Storm Irene,” Tuesday's attack began.  

From the latest attack issued Wednesday:

“Just like their Tea Party colleagues in Washington, the Vermont GOP leadership is intent on pitting people against each other for their own political gain,” Jake Perkinson, Vermont Democratic Party Chairman, said in a written statement.

Are the Vermont Dems taking free on-air advice from Eric Davis, the retired Middlebury College political science professor and frequent political commentator? The day before the Vermont Dem's attacks started, Davis told VPR that a link between the Vermont GOP and the U.S. House Republicans could hurt the party in the state.

If the Vermont Republican Party's leadership is seen in any way as supportive of what the House Republicans are doing in Washington, that could be very damaging for the Republican Party brand in Vermont in the next cycle,” Davis said. 


Pollina jumps into Dem-Prog redistricting spat

MONTPELIER – Sen. Anthony Pollina couldn’t sit idly by as members of the Vermont Democratic Party in a recent fundraising letter said Progressives were threatening health care reform through their work on the Legislative Apportionment Board.

Pollina is a long-time Progressive who is also a newly minted Democrat.

So Pollina fired off a letter of his own to Vermont Democratic Party executive director Jesse Bragg, pointing out that Progressives have long championed the kind of health care reform underway in Vermont and to suggest they were now threatening it was ludicrous.

“I find it absurd that the Democratic Party would accuse Progressives of undermining single payer health reforms as a fundraising tactic,” Pollina wrote in his letter, which was sent Monday night.

“You should know, for many, many years Progressives have had a clear, principled, unwavering commitment to single payer health care. Progressives have stood fast for single payer when leaders of the Democratic and Republican Parties have not,” he added.

Pollina’s letter to his newly adopted party was the latest missive fired in a spat between Democrats and Progressives over the work of the Legislative Apportionment Board, which is working to redraw voting districts based on the recent census.

The Republicans and Progressives on the board voted for a plan that makes a push for single-member districts, a move that could pit incumbent Democratic lawmakers against one another and was opposed by Democrats on the board.

In response, the Dems issued a fundraising letter that said the GOP and Progressive Party were threatening Democrats and thus their signature issue: health care reform.

“It’s likely you’ve heard about the Republican and Progressive Party’s joint effort to significantly alter Vermont’s existing State House and Senate districts,” the Democratic Party letter said.  

The letter went on: “In order to ensure the success of single-payer healthcare, we must maintain our strong majorities and hold onto the Governor’s office in 2012.These redistricting tactics threaten the success of Governor Shumlin's healthcare plan and many other democratic efforts that we've all worked hard to advance."

The Progressive Party sent out its own fundraising letter in response, and shortly after came Pollina’s letter.

Pollina said he just had a gut response to the VDP letter – which he said was full of “misinformation” – and needed to respond.

“I felt on a personal was well as political level a need to respond,” said Pollina.

Alicia D’Alessandro, communications director for the VDP, said the party received Pollina’s letter and has reached out to the Washington County Senator to try to have a chat with him but hadn’t heard back as of Tuesday evening.

D’Alessandro said she didn’t want to prolong dispute.

“This is not a big party fight,” she said.

But as for who should get credit for the success so far of health care reform, it’s Dems all the way, she said.

“Let’s be frank here,” said D’Alessandro. “The Democrats passed single-payer and we are happy to have Progressives as our allies. But a Democratic majority in the House and Senate and Democratic governor got it done.”

Here’s Pollina’s letter in its entirety:

Jesse Bragg                                                                                       

Vermont Democratic Party

Dear Jesse, 

I find it absurd that the Democratic Party would accuse Progressives of undermining single payer health reforms as a fundraising tactic. (Letter: Redistricting Tactics Threaten Healthcare Reform)

You should know, for many, many years Progressives have had a clear, principled, unwavering commitment to single payer health care. Progressives have stood fast for single payer when leaders of the Democratic and Republican Parties have not.

All of the Progressive members of the Legislature voted for the recently enacted health care reforms and played critical roles in shaping and advocating for the bill. The same cannot be said for all Democrats.

This suggests electing more Progressives and Progressive/ Democratic legislators would strengthen our health care reform, tax reform and job creation efforts.

In regards to the reapportionment board decision you referenced; a majority of the board did vote to emphasize single member districts. You may disagree with the vote, but single member districts are more democratic, allow a closer relationship between Legislators and citizens and mean candidates spend less money campaigning and have more time to talk to all their constituents.

You also know the reapportionment board only makes a recommendation. The real decision about the makeup of House districts will be made by members of the Legislature, a strong majority of Democrats and Progressives. Painting the board vote as political will only make the Legislature’s vote even more so, especially when it overturns the board’s recommendation and maintains the status quo.

I think it is important that we work together on important issues like health reform. Your fundraising letter creates divisions that are needless and counterproductive. Please rethink your strategy. 


Anthony Pollina P/D/WF

Vermont State Senate  

cc: Martha Abbott

       Judy Bevans

Vermont Dems pick new vice chair

The Vermont Democratic State Committee has a new vice chairman, the Vermont Democratic Party announced Monday.

Jacob Perkinson was named vice chairman at a meeting on Saturday in Randolph, according to a post on the Vermont Democratic Party website.

From the news release:

"…Party Vice Chair Michael Inners stepped down, effective immediately. The Democratic State Committee moved to (elect) Jacob Perkinson, current Chair of the Chittenden County Democratic Party, to succeed Inners as the new Vice Chair. Vermont Democratic Party Chair Judy Bevans praised the selection: 'Jake has been an asset to the party in Chittenden County. I’m so pleased to have him step up in this leadership role and I look forward to working with him.'"

Prior to his election to the Chair of the Chittenden County Democratic Committee, Perkinson served as chair of the Burlington City Democratic Committee, and was vice-chair for several years, the news release said.

A graduate of Vermont Law School, according to the news release, Perkinson is a Burlington resident known to his friends as "Pappy."